🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are more and more enabling the far right to set the public discourse, according to a recent study carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this trend has inadvertently helped radical groups by legitimising their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Over 20 Years of Media Reporting

The results, published in the European Journal of Political Research, relied on an computerized content review of over 520,000 articles from six national newspapers.

Capital-based researchers observed that as the radical faction moved from marginal topics in the late 1990s to central themes like assimilation and immigration, established political groups increasingly adapted their messaging in reaction.

This adaptation boosted the spread of these ideas and signaled to voters that such stances were legitimate.

Consequences for Democratic Systems

"Political discourse by mainstream parties plays a central role in the voting performance of the far right," stated a expert in political behavior participating in the research.

"This element has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was evident even when mainstream parties were criticising the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this attention is key."

Normalisation Effect Across the Continent

While the research was centered around Germany, this normalisation effect is likely to affect nations throughout the European continent.

"You see this a lot in European news outlets," explained another co-author. "The far right makes a statement and everyone starts talking about it for one week."

"Even if you're countering it, you're repeating it," he added.

Toughening of Political Discourse

At certain points, political figures have also toughened their language to align with that of the far right.

In a recently published interview, a former German chancellor called for widespread deportations and urged them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be observed across Europe, as elected officials from countries ranging from the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the radical right, particularly on migration.

This has created an feedback loop that would have been inconceivable a ten years prior.

Central Problem: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate party and you are discussing societal topics – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is determined by the pace of the far right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Some political parties have gone one step further, attempting to emulate the strict platform of the radical right, despite studies suggests that this approach drives the electorate to vote for the radical faction.

Progressive Impact and Voter Awareness

The scope of information gathered showed that the impact of radical parties had been gradual and had grown over time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," commented a researcher. "However, when you hear this pessimistic narrative around immigration frequently, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for example, by established parties, then of course this narrative gains more traction."

Requirement for Established Parties to Develop Their Own Narratives

The study highlighted the necessity for established political parties to carve out their distinct narratives, particularly on subjects such as immigration and integration, instead of constantly following the radical right.

"It resembles a choreography," said one researcher. "If the conductor is far-right and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which tune should be playing."