🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an international accord created to safeguard women from violence, covering family violence, following extensive and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The final decision now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish laws and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Debate and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked broad outcry both inside Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority support, the president could potentially send back the bill for further review if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect similar discussions in other member states