🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, states are channeling enormous sums into what's termed “sovereign AI” – developing national AI systems. From Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, states are vying to build AI that comprehends local languages and cultural specifics.

The Worldwide AI Competition

This movement is a component of a broader global race dominated by large firms from the US and China. While companies like OpenAI and a social media giant pour massive funds, developing countries are also placing their own gambles in the AI field.

But with such tremendous sums at stake, is it possible for smaller countries attain meaningful benefits? As noted by a analyst from a well-known thinktank, “Unless you’re a rich government or a large corporation, it’s quite a challenge to create an LLM from scratch.”

National Security Concerns

Numerous countries are unwilling to depend on overseas AI technologies. Across India, for example, American-made AI solutions have at times fallen short. One example involved an AI tool used to teach learners in a remote community – it spoke in the English language with a thick American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for native students.

Additionally there’s the defence dimension. In the Indian defence ministry, using specific foreign models is viewed not permissible. As one founder commented, It's possible it contains some unvetted data source that may state that, for example, Ladakh is outside of India … Using that certain system in a military context is a big no-no.”

He further stated, “I have spoken to individuals who are in defence. They aim to use AI, but, forget about specific systems, they prefer not to rely on Western technologies because details could travel abroad, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

National Initiatives

As a result, a number of countries are supporting local ventures. An example such a effort is in progress in India, in which an organization is attempting to develop a national LLM with state support. This initiative has dedicated about 1.25 billion dollars to AI development.

The expert foresees a system that is significantly smaller than premier models from American and Asian firms. He explains that the country will have to make up for the funding gap with talent. Located in India, we do not possess the luxury of investing huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we compete with such as the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the United States is investing? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the strategic thinking is essential.”

Native Priority

Across Singapore, a state-backed program is supporting language models educated in local regional languages. These particular tongues – for example the Malay language, the Thai language, Lao, Bahasa Indonesia, Khmer and more – are frequently inadequately covered in US and Chinese LLMs.

I wish the people who are developing these sovereign AI tools were informed of how rapidly and just how fast the frontier is progressing.

A senior director participating in the program explains that these models are created to supplement more extensive AI, as opposed to substituting them. Systems such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he states, commonly find it challenging to handle local dialects and local customs – speaking in unnatural the Khmer language, as an example, or proposing non-vegetarian dishes to Malaysian users.

Building local-language LLMs permits local governments to code in cultural nuance – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a advanced system built overseas.

He continues, I am cautious with the word independent. I think what we’re attempting to express is we want to be better represented and we want to grasp the abilities” of AI technologies.

Cross-Border Partnership

Regarding countries seeking to establish a position in an escalating worldwide landscape, there’s a different approach: collaborate. Experts connected to a well-known policy school recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative distributed among a consortium of developing countries.

They refer to the initiative “a collaborative AI effort”, drawing inspiration from Europe’s productive initiative to develop a rival to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. The plan would see the creation of a public AI company that would merge the assets of different nations’ AI initiatives – for example the UK, the Kingdom of Spain, the Canadian government, Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a viable alternative to the Western and Eastern leaders.

The main proponent of a paper describing the concept states that the idea has attracted the attention of AI ministers of at least several countries up to now, along with several national AI firms. While it is presently targeting “middle powers”, developing countries – Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda among them – have likewise indicated willingness.

He elaborates, Currently, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s diminished faith in the assurances of the present White House. Experts are questioning like, should we trust these technologies? What if they opt to