🔗 Share this article

The iPhone maker could be required to permit competitors to operate their own application platforms on Apple devices in the UK, after a ruling from the competition regulator.

This would be a major shift to the company's infamous "closed system" where apps can only be downloaded from its own official marketplace.

But the UK competition watchdog has designated both the tech giants as having "dominant market position" - indicating they have significant control over mobile platforms.

Watchdog Findings

The CMA said the two companies "could be restricting innovation and competition".

But the authority clarified it did not "determine or presume wrongdoing" from the companies.

"The app economy contributes 1.5% of the British economy and supports around four hundred thousand positions, which is why it's crucial these markets work well for enterprises," stated a senior official from the competition authority.

Around ninety to one hundred percent of British smartphones operate using the two tech companies' operating systems, creating what the regulator calls an "virtual monopoly".

Based on current data, nearly half of UK mobile owners own an iPhone - which runs Apple's iOS - with the vast majority of the rest using the Android OS.

The Company's Reaction

The regulatory probe focused on how dominant Apple and Google's own applications are versus competitors - as well as their browsers and operating systems.

It is unclear what changes the regulator will seek to implement, but previously it published guidelines outlining possible actions it could take.

These include requiring it to be more straightforward for people to transition between iOS and Android phones, and for both companies to list applications "fairly and openly" in their marketplaces.

Apple specifically may be required to allow third-party marketplaces on its products, and let people to install apps directly from developer sites.

This would follow comparable regulations in the European Union, which previously imposed measures against the company for restrictive practices.

The technology firm warned the UK could lose access to receiving updates - as has occurred in the EU - which the organization blames on heavy regulation.

For instance, some AI capabilities which have been rolled out in other parts of the world are not available in the European market.

"Apple faces fierce competition in every sector where we do business, and we work tirelessly to create the finest offerings, solutions and user experience," the organization said in a statement.

"Britain's implementation of EU-style rules would undermine that, leaving users with reduced data protection and safety, slower availability to latest functions, and a divided, more complicated user journey."

The Search Giant's Standpoint

Google device owners can presently use third-party app stores - though commentators say they are not as smooth as the company's official application marketplace.

The regulator's plan said Google may have to "change the user experience" of downloading apps straight from online sources, as well as "eliminate barriers" when using third-party platforms.

"We simply do not see the rationale for today's designation decision," a company policy executive remarked.

The executive said "the majority" of Android users use third-party platforms or download apps directly from a creator's site, and asserted there is a much wider selection of applications available for Google device owners versus those on iOS products.

"There are now 24,000 Android phone models from thirteen hundred device makers worldwide, facing strong rivalry from Apple's platform in the United Kingdom," the representative continued.

Google's platform is an open-source operating system, which means developers can use and build on top of it for free.

The company argues this means it opens up competition.

But advocacy organizations said curbs on these companies' power in different nations "are already helping businesses to innovate and giving consumers more choice".

"Their dominance is now creating genuine problems by limiting options for consumers and competition for businesses," commented a consumer advocate.